Strategy

Rankings swung on October 24. Before you call the client, check whether the tracker got bad data.

Share
Illustration: AI-generated image by Evolved Pros

Short answer: If your client's rankings dropped on Oct 24, 2026, check Search Console before you change a page or call the client. AccuRanker says Google sent bad results to 40% of its first desktop fetches that day, but after its checks only 3.23% of stored desktop keyword-days in its sample still looked wrong. Google has listed no ranking update. (Search Engine Watch, Oct 26, 2026, citing AccuRanker)

TLDR

  • Oct 24 volatility across many trackers; SER suspects an adjustment; Google confirmed nothing. (SER, Oct 25, 2026)
  • 40% of AccuRanker's first desktop fetches were "poisoned"; 3.23% of stored keyword-days stayed affected. (AccuRanker, via SEW, Oct 26, 2026)
  • Confirm in Search Console first. Then decide.

What happened to rankings on October 24?

Advertisement

AdCellerant

Search Engine Roundtable reported "significant ranking volatility" on Saturday, Oct 24, 2026 across many third-party tracking tools, plus heavy SEO chatter. Barry Schwartz wrote that this made him believe Google released a ranking adjustment Friday into Saturday. That is his read, not a Google statement. (SER, Oct 25, 2026) The same post reminds readers that tracking tools have been struggling for about a month.

Google's Search Status Dashboard lists no ranking update after the September 2026 spam update, which started Sep 24, 2026 and ran 13 days, 16 hours. Schwartz's Oct 24 adjustment remains unconfirmed. (Dashboard, re-read by EP Reviewer Oct 26, 2026)

What does "poisoned" data mean?

AccuRanker uses the word for Google pages that look normal but have the usual organic listings swapped out. Its updated research says bad Google data affected 40% of its initial desktop fetches on Oct 24. SEW calls AccuRanker's explanation of Google's behavior a vendor assessment. After re-fetching and checks, 3.23% of stored desktop keyword-days in its sample still failed. On Oct 25 that fell to 0.57% on desktop and 1.04% on mobile, figures AccuRanker labels early. (Search Engine Watch, Martin Ashmere, Oct 26, 2026; AccuRanker blog)

Search Engine Watch put it plainly: the 40% figure "does not mean 40% of customer rankings were wrong."

Sponsored

Evolved Pros Academy

This is one vendor describing its own system. It does not tell you the error rate in your tracker.

Should I call the client?

Not yet. A panic call based on one tracker's bad day costs you credibility when the numbers bounce back.

The same habit applies when an agent pulls the report for you: write the checking rules before you hand work to an agent.

How do I check whether the drop is real?

Advertisement

AdCellerant
  1. Open Search Console Performance for the affected queries.
  2. Compare matching date ranges with the same filters, by query and page.
  3. Look at clicks and impressions, not only average position.
  4. Remember the newest Search Console points can be preliminary. Google marks them with a dotted line.
  5. Re-check the tracker in 48 hours. (Steps drawn from Search Engine Watch guidance, Oct 26, 2026)

What if clicks really did fall?

Then investigate it as a real loss. Look for a pattern across the affected pages and check indexing and technical issues before you rewrite pages that were working.

Next step

Who: the account manager who owns the SEO report. What: run the five-step check on any query that moved on Oct 24. When: before the next client report or call. How: note the query, date and Search Console result in the report so any later correction is traceable.

Advertisement

AdCellerant

The Brief

One read every weekday from Evolved Pros Media.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Community

Start free. VIP is there when you want more.

Join the Community with no card. VIP is $99 when you want Fit and Academy depth. Media stays open.

More in Strategy

See all

From the Podcast

All episodes

Episode 10

From Managed to Modern: Evolving the MSP Channel with Juan Fernandez

65:23

Episode 9

Mentorship and the Generational Gap with Quang Do

44:10